ArticleCureus2024
Spontaneous Splenic Rupture in a Young Patient: A Comprehensive Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Spontaneous rupture of a normal spleen successfully treated with elective laparoscopic splenectomy: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous splenic rupture (SSR), a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, typically occurs in the absence of trauma or underlying splenic disease. This report aims to contribute to the limited body of knowledge regarding its occurrence, diagnosis, and management in this demographic. We describe the case of a 20-year-old patient with no significant medical history who presented with acute abdominal pain and hypovolemic shock. Imaging revealed an unexpected splenic rupture without any preceding trauma or identifiable risk factors. The patient's clinical progression, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic approach are discussed in detail. This case underscores the importance of considering SSR in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen in young patients, even in the absence of predisposing factors. We review the literature to highlight the epidemiology, possible etiologies, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options for SSR. The peculiarities of managing such cases in young patients are also discussed, emphasizing a tailored approach to balance the risks of conservative management against surgical intervention. In conclusion, SSR, though rare in young patients, should be a diagnostic consideration in cases of unexplained acute abdomen. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial for favorable outcomes. This case adds to the existing literature by providing insight into the presentation and management of this condition in a young, healthy individual, thereby aiding in enhancing clinical vigilance and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.