ArticleCureus2024
Optimizing Surgical Management of Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Reduction Techniques.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTibial plateau fractures pose a significant challenge to orthopedic surgeons due to their complex nature and potential for long-term morbidity. Surgical intervention is often necessary to restore anatomical alignment and optimize functional outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) compared to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the management of tibial plateau fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present hospital-based observational study was conducted at Agartala Government Medical College for two years. Seventy adult patients with tibial plateau fractures were included, with surgical interventions performed based on fracture characteristics. Postoperative outcomes, including knee range of movements, functional recovery, and complication rates, were assessed at six months.
resultsMIPPO demonstrated superior outcomes compared to ORIF, with a higher proportion of participants achieving knee range of movements > 120 degrees (66.7% versus 36%; p = 0.030), excellent functional outcomes (66.7% versus 36%; p = 0.046), and lower postoperative complication rates (2.2% versus 28%; p = 0.001). Fracture union times were significantly shorter in MIPPO (12.49 weeks) when compared to ORIF (14 weeks) (p = 0.009).
conclusionMIPPO offers advantages over conventional ORIF in terms of functional recovery and complication rates while demonstrating comparable fracture union times. These findings advocate for the adoption of MIPPO as a preferred surgical technique for tibial plateau fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.