Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Poor sleep quality may trigger cognitive deficits after recovery from COVID-19.

A Carnes-Vendrell, G Piñol-Ripoll, M Ariza, N Cano, B Segura, C Junque, J Béjar, C Barrue, M Garolera, Nautilus Project Collaborative Group

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05307549 completednot on this map

COVID-19 and Brain: Cognition and Mental Health

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsCOVID-19
NCT05307575 completednot on this map

Cognition, Emotion/Behavior, Functionality and Brain Connectivity in Recovered COVID-19 Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorConsorci Sanitari de TerrassaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled630ConditionsPost-COVID Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A Carnes-VendrellCognitive Disorders Unit, Cognition and Behavior Study Group, Hospital Universitari Santa Maria, Lleida, Spain.
G Piñol-RipollCognitive Disorders Unit, Cognition and Behavior Study Group, Hospital Universitari Santa Maria, Lleida, Spain.
M ArizaClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
N CanoClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
B SeguraMedical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
C JunqueMedical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J BéjarFaculty of Informatics of Barcelona (FIB), Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
C BarrueFaculty of Informatics of Barcelona (FIB), Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
M GaroleraClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Nautilus Project Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In the present study, we aimed to assess the cognition of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) participants in relation to their subjective sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) and to analyse possible moderators of this effect, such as quality of life (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, EQ-5D), fatigue (Chadler Fatigue Questionnaire, CFQ), cognitive reserve (Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire, CRC), and subjective cognitive complaints (Memory Failures of Everyday Questionnaire, MFE-30). Methods: We included 373 individuals with PCC and 126 healthy controls (HCs) from the NAUTILUS Project (NCT05307549 and NCT05307575) who were assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and various questionnaires. Results: We found that PCC participants with poor sleep quality had a 4.3% greater risk of immediate verbal memory deficits than those with good sleep quality, as indicated by the greater odds ratio (OR) of 1.043 and confidence interval (CI) of 1.023-1.063. Additionally, their risk of immediate verbal memory disorders was multiplied by 2.4 when their EQ-5D score was low (OR 0.33; CI 0.145-0.748), and they had a lower risk of delayed visual memory deficits with a greater CRC (OR 0.963; CI 0.929-0.999). With respect to processing speed, PCC participants with poor sleep quality had a 6.7% greater risk of deficits as the MFE increased (OR 1.059; CI 1.024-1.096), and the risk of slowed processing speed tripled with a lower EQ-5D (OR 0.021; CI 0.003-0.141). Conclusion: These results indicate that poor subjective sleep quality is a potential trigger for cognitive deficits. Therapeutic strategies to maximize sleep quality could include reducing sleep disturbances and perhaps cognitive impairment in PCC individuals.

Indexed as

cognitioncognitive reserveCOVID-19fatiguepost-COVID-19 conditionquality of lifesleep qualitysubjective cognitive complaints

Identifiers

PMID38860054
PMCPMC11164190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.