Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860023›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2024

Assessment of four different dietary amino acid profiles recommended for ISA Brown layer hens: A validation study.

Mehdi Toghyani, Shemil Macelline, Juliano C de Paula Dorigam, Peter V Chrystal, Peter H Selle, Sonia Y Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehdi ToghyaniSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, NSW, Australia.
Shemil MacellineSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, NSW, Australia.
Juliano C de Paula DorigamEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang 63457, Germany.
Peter V ChrystalPoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden 2570, NSW, Australia.
Peter H SellePoultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden 2570, NSW, Australia.
Sonia Y LiuSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current feeding study was designed to validate the two dietary essential amino acid profiles (EAAP) established based on linear broken-line (LBL) and quadratic broken-line (QBL) models, in a previous study, against Evonik (AMINOHen) and breeder recommendations for ISA Brown layers for peak production (PP, 20 to 44 weeks of age), and post peak production (post PP, 44 to 75 weeks of age). The EAAP based on LBL models on average had 19.5% and 26.0% lower digestible AA (Lys, Met + Cys, Thr, Trp, Ile and Val), than the EAAP based on QBL models for PP and post PP, respectively. The EAAP based on AMINOHen and breeder recommendation had lower digestible AA than QBL, and higher EAAP than LBL models for both production phases. At 20 weeks of age, 224 ISA Brown layer hens were weighed and randomly allocated to individual battery cages. Each of the four diets was replicated 8 times with 7 birds per replicate. Egg production was recorded daily, and egg weights were measured at the end of each week. Feed consumption was measured at the end of each period. The egg production rate was not significantly affected by the diets and remained at around 98.0% (PP) and 95.0% (post PP) (

Indexed as

Egg massEgg productionIdeal amino acid profileRegression model

Identifiers

PMID38860023
PMCPMC11163148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.