Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859993›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

What is the cognitive footprint of insular glioma?

Noah M Nichols, Bahie Ezzat, Allison C Waters, Fedor Panov, Raymund L Yong, Isabelle M Germano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noah M NicholsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Bahie EzzatDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Allison C WatersDepartment of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Fedor PanovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Raymund L YongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Isabelle M GermanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment has a profound deleterious impact on long-term outcomes of glioma surgery. The human insula, a deep cortical structure covered by the operculum, plays a role in a wide range of cognitive functions including interceptive thoughts and salience processing. Both low-grade (LGG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG) involve the insula, representing up to 25% of LGG and 10% of HGG. Surgical series from the past 30 years support the role of primary cytoreductive surgery for insular glioma patients; however, reported cognitive outcomes are often limited to speech and language function. The breath of recent neuroscience literature demonstrates that the insula plays a broader role in cognition including interoceptive thoughts and salience processing. This article summarizes the vast functional role of the healthy human insula highlighting how this knowledge can be leveraged to improve the care of patients with insular gliomas.

Indexed as

brain tumor surgerycognitionconnectomicsfunctional outcomesinsular glioma

Identifiers

PMID38859993
PMCPMC11163043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.