Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859986›Full record

ArticleKansas journal of medicine2024

Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Jake M Bianco, Nathan W Whitsell, Thomas J McCormack, Randall L Lais, Bradley R Dart, Brandon R Scott, Rosalee E Zackula, Chad M Corrigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kansas journal of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation in cephalomedullary nail fixation of hip fractures: a step towards evidence-based patient selection criteria.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jake M BiancoUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Nathan W WhitsellUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Thomas J McCormackDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Kansas City, Kansas City, KS.
Randall L LaisUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Bradley R DartUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Brandon R ScottUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Rosalee E ZackulaUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Chad M CorriganUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if augmentation of the helical blade with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement decreases the rates of varus cut-out and medial perforation in geriatric intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study at two urban Level I trauma centers. Patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture (classified as AO 31A1-3) who were treated with the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) from 2018 to 2021 were eligible for the study. Medical records and post-operative radiographs were reviewed to determine procedure complications and reoperations. Results: Of the 179 patients studied, cement augmentation (CA) was used in 93 patients (52%) and no cement augmentation (NCA) was used in 86 (48%). There were no significant differences between group demographics and fracture reduction grades. Varus cut-out occurred three times in the CA group and five times in the NCA group (p = 0.48). Medial perforation occurred three times, all in the NCA group (p = 0.11). The most frequent complication was symptomatic blade lateralization from fracture collapse, with eight occurrences in the CA group compared with two in the NCA group (p = 0.10). There were 10 reoperations in the CA group and 9 in the NCA group (p = 0.99). The most common reason for reoperation was varus cut-out and the most common revision procedure was hip arthroplasty. Conclusions: Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFNA fixation system with and without cement augmentation have similar complication profiles and reoperation rates.

Indexed as

cement augmentationcephalomedullary nailgeriatricintertrochanteric fracturepolymethylmethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID38859986
PMCPMC11164424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.