Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859948›Full record

ReviewEuropean clinical respiratory journal2024

Added value of EUS-B-FNA to bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer.

Mohammad A Issa, Paul F Clementsen, Christian B Laursen, Ida S Christiansen, Laurence Crombag, Peter Vilmann, Uffe Bodtger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Management of lung cancer in older adults.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad A IssaRespiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Næstved, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-2287
Paul F ClementsenRespiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Næstved, Denmark.
Christian B LaursenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ida S ChristiansenRespiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Næstved, Denmark.
Laurence CrombagDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter VilmannGastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Uffe BodtgerRespiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Næstved, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bronchoscopy and EBUS are standard procedures in lung cancer work-up but have low diagnostic yield in lesions outside the central airways and hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes. Growing evidence on introducing the EBUS endoscope into the oesophagus (EUS-B) in the same session as bronchoscopy/EBUS gives access to new anatomical areas that can be safely biopsied. Objective: To summarize the current evidence of the added value of EUS-B-FNA to bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA in lung cancer work-up. Methods: A narrative review. Results: Few randomized trials or prospective studies are available. Prospective studies show that add-on EUS-B-FNA increases diagnostic yield when sampling abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes, para-oesophageal lung and left adrenal gland. A large retrospective series on EUS-B-FNA from retroperitoneal lymph nodes suggests high diagnostic yield without safety concerns, as do casuistic reports on EUS-B-FNA from mediastinal pleural thickening, pancreatic lesions, ascites fluid and pericardial effusions. No study has systematically assessed both diagnostic yield, safety, patient reported outcomes, adverse events and costs. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of add-on EUS-B to standard bronchoscopy and EBUS in lung cancer work-up appears very promising without safety concerns, giving the pulmonologist access to a variety of sites out of reach with other minimally invasive techniques. Little is known on patient-reported outcomes and costs. Future and prospective research should focus on effectiveness aspects to clarify whether overall benefits of add-on EUS-B sufficiently exceed overall downsides.

Indexed as

bronchoscopydiagnosisEBUSEUS-BLung cancerstaging

Identifiers

PMID38859948
PMCPMC11164041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.