Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859946›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Cross-Sectional Study on Knowledge, Awareness, Self-Care Practices About Glaucoma Among Doctors in South India.

Adithya Tellakula, Meera Devasena M, Rejo Varkey Cyriac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adithya TellakulaOphthalmology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Meera Devasena MOphthalmology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Rejo Varkey CyriacOphthalmology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Glaucoma is the major cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Glaucoma affects the optic nerve head in the posterior segment of the eye and the defects lead to permanent blindness if left untreated. Poor knowledge about this disease is strongly correlated with delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate doctors' knowledge and self-care practices about glaucoma at a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, presuming that healthcare professionals constitute an effective conduit between the population at risk and ophthalmologists. Methods We carried out this cross-sectional survey among 252 doctors practicing allopathic medicine in a tertiary care hospital in Chennai from July 2022 to December 2022. We have collected 252 samples by simple random sampling method. We have excluded doctors who have a degree in ophthalmology or practicing it. The data collection was interview-based using a pre-designed, structured questionnaire that contained questions on sociodemographic characteristics age, gender, and specialty in medicine. It also included questions assessing knowledge and self-care practices about glaucoma among doctors of various specialties other than ophthalmology. We entered the collected data into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA), cleaned it, and analyzed it using SPSS version 16. Results The mean age of the doctors was 33.24 ± 10.90 years in this study. About 132 (52.4%) of the study participants were females. Only 91 (36.1%) of respondents knew that glaucoma may permanently impair vision, but nearly 240 (95.2%) believed that it could be treated. Two hundred seventeen (86.1%) participants were aware that glaucoma runs in families. About 218(86.5%) doctors were aware that glaucoma destroys the optic nerve in the eye, and 171 (67.9%) knew that peripheral vision loss happens before central vision loss. Only 146 (57.9%) of physicians had their eye pressure examined. About 232(92.1%) doctors had their eyes checked routinely. Only 42 (16.7%) of physicians took part in glaucoma awareness campaigns. Nearly 199 (79%) of those surveyed thought it was required to check a patient's family members for glaucoma. We note that among doctors, the knowledge and practice score of correct replies was strongly connected with work experience (P value = 0.035). Conclusion The need for extensive eye health education and information distribution for healthcare workers should be stressed. Teaching the hospital staff about the symptoms and prognosis of this "silent thief of sight" might be a crucial first step in providing preventive ophthalmic treatment.

Indexed as

blindnessglaucomahealthcare professionalsknowledgeself-care practice

Identifiers

PMID38859946
PMCPMC11163388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.