ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Prognostic factors in postoperative patients with cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, Dermatoscopic, Histological and Molecular Prognostic and Predictive Factors of Metastatic Melanoma Response to Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Drug Class Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a machine learning-based model for prognostic prediction in melanoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the relationship between total serum calcium and melanoma development: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is a prevalent tumor associated with a poor prognosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and evaluate prognostic factors for patients with cutaneous melanoma following surgery, thereby providing crucial insights for enhancing patient outcomes. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science for studies on postoperative prognostic factors of cutaneous melanoma up to March 2024. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed, followed by meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was conducted with Stata 17 software to verify the robustness of the findings. Eleven studies encompassing 27,352 patients were included. The meta-analysis identified several prognostic factors impacting disease-specific survival post-surgery: age over 50 years (HR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), female gender (HR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.87), Breslow thickness greater than 2 mm (HR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.06-1.17), presence of ulceration (HR=2.06, 95% CI: 1.63-2.60), and positive sentinel lymph node (HR=3.03, 95% CI: 2.50-3.66). TSA confirmed the adequacy of the sample size. Aggressive treatment strategies are recommended for patients exhibiting these characteristics to improve prognosis and extend 5-year survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.