Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859846›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024

Development and validation of nomogram models for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: a cohort study based on the SEER database.

Ning Meng, Xiaoman Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Haotian Wu, Tongkun Li, Jiaxuan Yang, Ping'an Ding, Honghai Guo, Yuan Tian, Peigang Yang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ning MengThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Xiaoman NiuThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Jiaxiang WuThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Haotian WuThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Tongkun LiThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Jiaxuan YangThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Ping'an DingThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Honghai GuoThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Yuan TianThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Peigang YangThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Zhidong ZhangThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Dong WangThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.
Qun ZhaoThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish nomogram models for predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) patients.

methodsData from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for 5,451 GCLM patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were analyzed. The cohort was divided into a training set (3,815 cases) and an internal validation set (1,636 cases). External validation included 193 patients from the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and 171 patients from the People's Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, spanning 2016-2018. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified eight independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in GCLM patients, including age, histological type, grade, tumor size, surgery, chemotherapy, bone metastasis, and lung metastasis. Two nomogram models were developed based on these factors and evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

resultsInternal validation showed that the nomogram models outperformed the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system in predicting 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS and CSS in GCLM patients (1-year OS: 0.801 vs. 0.593, P < 0.001; 1-year CSS: 0.807 vs. 0.598, P < 0.001; 2-year OS: 0.803 vs. 0.630, P < 0.001; 2-year CSS: 0.802 vs. 0.633, P < 0.001; 3-year OS: 0.824 vs. 0.691, P < 0.001; 3-year CSS: 0.839 vs. 0.692, P < 0.001).

conclusionThis study developed and validated nomogram models using SEER database data to predict OS and CSS in GCLM patients. These models offer improved prognostic accuracy over traditional staging systems, aiding in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

cancer specific survivalGastric cancer with liver metastasisnomogramoverall survivalSEER

Identifiers

PMID38859846
PMCPMC11162657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.