ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Potential antitumor effects of short-chain fatty acids in breast cancer models.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Microbiome and Response to Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Oncology research · 2026Pooled it
- Unravelling novel microbial players in the breast tissue of TNBC patients: a meta-analytic perspective.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Pooled it
- Modulation of the response to immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: the role of the microbiota and microbial metabolites in the tumor microenvironment.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Postbiotics Against Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review Bridging Preclinical Evidence with Potential Clinical Application.Cancers · 2026Review
- The trends and hotspots of gut microbiota for breast cancer from 2005 to 2024: A bibliometric and visual analysis.Medicine · 2026Review
- Crotonate suppresses breast cancer metastasis and promotes immunotherapy response by inducing ACSS2-mediated EZH2-K348 crotonylation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Immunomodulatory effects of short-chain fatty acids and immune-supporting nutrients on slice cultures of head and neck tumors.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The role of gut mycobiome in responses to cancer immunotherapy.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Comparison and correlation analysis of microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acid profile in Milk across 15 mammalian species.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Bacterial metabolites: Effects on the development of breast cancer and therapeutic efficacy (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Integrating immunotherapy with conventional treatment regime for breast cancer patients- an amalgamation of armamentarium.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) have been explored against cancer due to the crosstalk between gut microbiota alterations and the immune system as a crucial role in cancer development. We evaluated the SCFAs effects in both in vitro and in vivo breast cancer models. In vitro, the SCFAs displayed contrasting effects on viability index, according to the evaluation of breast cancer cells with different phenotypes, human MCF-7, SK-BR-3, MDA-MD-231, or the mouse 4T1 lineage. Acetate displayed minimal effects at concentrations up to 100 mM. Alternatively, propionate increases or reduces cell viability depending on the concentration. Butyrate and valerate showed consistent time- and concentration-dependent effects on the viability of human or mouse breast cancer cells. The selective FFA2 4-CMTB or FFA3 AR420626 receptor agonists failed to overtake the SCFA actions, except by modest inhibitory effects on MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cell viability. The FFA2 CATPB or FFA3 and β-hydroxybutyrate receptor antagonists lacked significant activity on human cell lines, although CATPB reduced 4T1 cell viability. Butyrate significantly affected cell morphology, clonogenicity, and migration, according to the evaluation of MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells. A preliminary examination of in vivo oral effects of butyrate, propionate, or valerate, dosed in prophylactic or therapeutic regimens, on several parameters evaluated in an orthotopic breast cancer model showed a reduction of lung metastasis in post-tumor induction butyrate-treated mice. Overall, the present results indicate that in vitro effects of SCFAs did not rely on FFA2 or FFA3 receptor activation, and they were not mirrored in vivo, at least at the tested conditions. Overall, the present results indicate potential in vitro inhibitory effects of SCFAs in breast cancer, independent of FFA2 or FFA3 receptor activation, and, in the metastatic breast cancer model, the butyrate-dosed therapeutic regimen reduced the number of lung metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.