Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859739›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024

Fine-Scale Spatial Prediction on the Risk of

Kyung-Duk Min, Yae Jee Baek, Kyungwon Hwang, Na-Ri Shin, So-Dam Lee, Hyesu Kan, Joon-Sup Yeom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyung-Duk Min *College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-2187
Yae Jee Baek *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-4940
Kyungwon HwangDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-2325
Na-Ri ShinDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-9513
So-Dam LeeDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3476-3553
Hyesu KanDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3583-7049
Joon-Sup YeomDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. joonsup.yeom@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-7170

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2021-07-013Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2022-07-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria elimination strategies in the Republic of Korea (ROK) have decreased malaria incidence but face challenges due to delayed case detection and response. To improve this, machine learning models for predicting malaria, focusing on high-risk areas, have been developed.

methodsThe study targeted the northern region of ROK, near the demilitarized zone, using a 1-km grid to identify areas for prediction. Grid cells without residential buildings were excluded, leaving 8,425 cells. The prediction was based on whether at least one malaria case was reported in each grid cell per month, using spatial data of patient locations. Four algorithms were used: gradient boosted (GBM), generalized linear (GLM), extreme gradient boosted (XGB), and ensemble models, incorporating environmental, sociodemographic, and meteorological data as predictors. The models were trained with data from May to October (2019-2021) and tested with data from May to October 2022. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

resultsThe AUROC of the prediction models performed excellently (GBM = 0.9243, GLM = 0.9060, XGB = 0.9180, and ensemble model = 0.9301). Previous malaria risk, population size, and meteorological factors influenced the model most in GBM and XGB.

conclusionMachine-learning models with properly preprocessed malaria case data can provide reliable predictions. Additional predictors, such as mosquito density, should be included in future studies to improve the performance of models.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMalaria, VivaxPlasmodium vivaxROC CurveAlgorithmsArea Under CurveHumansIncidenceRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsExtreme Gradient BoostingGeneralized Linear ModelGradient Boosted ModelMachine LearningMalariaPredictor Model

Identifiers

PMID38859739
PMCPMC11164649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.