Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859705›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion Change after Anterior 3-Level Hybrid Surgery Compared with Cervical Laminoplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.

Yuxiao Deng, Junbo He, Hua Chen, Beiyu Wang, Quan Gong, Tao Li, Hao Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Imaging anatomy study on utilizing uncinate process "inflection point" as a landmark for anterior cervical spine decompression surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuxiao DengDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Junbo HeDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hua ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5795-7910
Beiyu WangDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Quan GongDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tao LiDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-6232

Funding

Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2019YFS0135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCervical alignment and range of motion (ROM) changes after cervical spine surgery are related to cervical biomechanical and functions. Few studies compared these parameters between posterior laminoplasty and anterior 3-level hybrid surgery incorporating anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cervical disc replacement (CDR). This study is aimed to detect the differences of cervical alignment and ROM changes of the two surgeries in a matched-cohort study.

methodsFrom January 2018 and May 2020, 51 patients who underwent 3-level hybrid surgery incorporating ACDF with ACDR were included. A 1:1 match of the patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty based on age, gender, duration of symptoms, body mass index, and cervical alignment type was utilized as control group. General data (operative time, blood loss, etc.), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, VAS (Visual Analog Score), NDI (The Neck Disability Index), cervical sagittal alignment, and cervical range of motion (ROM) were recorded and compared.

resultsBoth groups gained significant improvement in JOA, VAS, NDI scores postoperatively (p < 0.05). Cervical alignment significantly increased in hybrid group and decreased in control group after surgeries (p < 0.001). ROM decrease was similar in two groups. For cervical lordosis, though cervical alignment angle in control group decreased, the final follow-up cervical alignment and cervical alignment changes were not significantly different between hybrid and control groups. For cervical non-lordosis, cervical alignment decreased in control group while increased in hybrid group. At final follow-up, cervical alignment and the changes between the two groups were significantly different. Both control group and hybrid group had similar ROM decrease after the surgery no matter whether there was cervical lordosis or non-lordosis. Hybrid surgery showed cervical alignments significantly improved and similar ROM preservation compared with control group at final follow-up both for 1-level and 2-level disc replacement subgroups.

conclusionsThe hybrid surgery demonstrated advantages of preserving cervical alignment and gaining similar cervical ROM preservation compared with cervical laminoplasty, especially for cervical non-lordosis. Given the importance of restoring lordotic cervical alignment, hybrid surgery may be preferred over laminoplasty to treat multilevel cervical disc herniation.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeDiskectomyLaminoplastyRange of Motion, ArticularSpinal FusionAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTotal Disc ReplacementAnterior Hybrid SurgeryCervical Spine AlignmentLaminoplastyNon‐LordosisROM

Identifiers

PMID38859705
PMCPMC11293915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.