Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858847›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging

Biological variation in cervical spinal cord MRI morphometry in healthy individuals and people with multiple sclerosis.

Sarah R Cook, Kritin Vasamreddy, Anna Combes, Simon Vandekar, Mereze Visagie, Delaney Houston, Lily Wald, Ashwin Kumar, Megan McGrath, Colin D McKnight and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sarah R CookVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kritin VasamreddyVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Anna CombesVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Simon VandekarDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mereze VisagieVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Delaney HoustonVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Lily WaldVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ashwin KumarVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Megan McGrathVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Colin D McKnightDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Francesca BagnatoNeuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Seth A SmithVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kristin P O'GradyVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-2026

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002245 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$9.3M
Replacement and Upgrade of a 3T MR Scanner for ResearchS10OD021771 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2016 to 2016
$2.0M
Structural and Functional MRI of the Cervical Spinal Cord in Multiple SclerosisR01NS109114 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Development of Advanced MRI for the Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord for Clinical ApplicationK01EB030039 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI O'GRADY, KRISTIN POOLE · 2020 to 2023
$622k
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Vanderbilt CTSA UL1TR002243National Multiple Sclerosis Society RG-1501-02840NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002245NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB030039NIH HHS K01EB030039NIH HHS KL2TR002245NIH HHS R01NS109114NIH HHS S10 OD021771NIH OD 1S10OD021771-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeConclusions from prior literature regarding the impact of sex, age, and height on spinal cord (SC) MRI morphometrics are conflicting, while the effect of body weight on SC morphometrics has been found to be nonsignificant. The purpose of this case-control study is to assess the associations between cervical SC MRI morphometric parameters and age, sex, height, and weight to establish their potential role as confounding variables in a clinical study of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared to a cohort of healthy volunteers.

methodsSixty-nine healthy volunteers and 31 people with MS underwent cervical SC MRI at 3 Tesla field strength. Images were centered at the C3/C4 intervertebral disc and processed using Spinal Cord Toolbox v.4.0.2. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to evaluate the effects of biological variables and disease status on morphometric parameters.

resultsSex, age, and height had significant effects on cord and gray matter (GM) cross-sectional area (CSA) as well as the GM:cord CSA ratio. There were no significant effects of body weight on morphometric parameters. The effect of MS disease duration on cord CSA in the C4 level was significant when controlling for all other variables.

conclusionsStudies of disease-related changes in SC morphometry should control for sex, age, and height to account for physiological variation.

Indexed as

Cervical CordMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisAdultCase-Control StudiesCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesYoung Adultautomated segmentationcervical spineintersubject variabilitymagnetic resonance imagingmultiple sclerosissex differencesspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID38858847
PMCPMC11236499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.