Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858814›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Brace-related Stress and Quality of Life Parameters between Chêneau and Boston Braces: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Saudi Arabia.

Abdulmonem M Alsiddiky, Khalid S Alharbi, Omar A Ababtain, Abdullah F Alnuwaybit, Mazin A Zamzami, Ahmad A Basalah, Wesam H Al-Sabban

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulmonem M AlsiddikyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Research Chair of Spinal Deformities, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid S AlharbiCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7550-7338
Omar A AbabtainCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-0245
Abdullah F AlnuwaybitCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2137-2112
Mazin A ZamzamiBiochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Centre of Artificial Intelligence for Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad A BasalahMechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Islamic Architecture, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Wesam H Al-SabbanDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Systems, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most prevalent spinal deformity affecting healthy children. Although AIS typically lacks symptomatic manifestations, its resultant deformities can affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Evaluating QoL and stress levels is crucial in determining the optimal brace type for AIS patients; however, research comparing the effectiveness of different brace types in this regard is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of Boston versus Chêneau braces on QoL and stress levels in AIS patients.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a medical institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, involving 52 eligible patients selected through stratified random sampling based on type of brace as the main stratum. The inclusion criteria were idiopathic scoliosis, age ≥ 10 years, bracing for at least 3 months, and no history of cancer. QoL was evaluated according to the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22r) and stress levels according to the eight-item Bad Sobernheim stress questionnaire (BSSQ-Brace). Independent-sample t-tests were used to compare brace-related QoL and stress level according to participants' sex and brace type.

resultsOverall, 32 participants were treated with Boston braces (seven men and 25 women), with a median (IQR) age of 11.00 years (10.00-13.00), and 20 participants were treated with Chêneau braces (three men, 17 women), with a median (IQR) age of 12.50 years (10.00-14.25). The total SRS-22 score was not significantly different between the brace groups (p = 0.158). However, patients in the Boston brace group reported significantly higher satisfaction levels (median = 4.00, IQR = 3.50-4.50) than did those in the Chêneau brace group (median = 3.25, IQR = 2.38-4.13, p = 0.013, moderate effect size = 0.345, 95% CI = 0.060 to 0.590). Furthermore, the BSSQ-brace total score was significantly higher in the Boston brace group (median = 9.00, IQR = 8.00-12.00) than in the Chêneau brace group (median = 7.50, IQR = 4.75-10.00, p = 0.007, moderate effect size = 0.376, 95% CI = 0.130 to 0.590), indicating higher stress levels in the Chêneau brace group.

conclusionThe QoL in AIS patients undergoing brace treatment was comparable across groups. Nonetheless, patients who used Chêneau braces experienced higher stress levels and lower treatment satisfaction rates than did those who used Boston braces. These findings can inform clinical decisions regarding prescription of bracing types and highlight the need for further in-depth research.

Indexed as

BracesQuality of LifeScoliosisAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentBracesDeformityQuality of lifeSatisfactionScoliosis

Identifiers

PMID38858814
PMCPMC11293924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.