Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858766›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Reliability and reproducibility of the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, a multi-site prospective study: validating a novel ultrasound technique for comprehensive assessment of venous congestion.

August A Longino, Katharine C Martin, Katarina R Leyba, Luke McCormack, Gabriel Siegel, Vibhu M Sharma, Matthew Riscinti, Carolina O Lopez, Ivor S Douglas, Edward A Gill

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Deresuscitation Informed by Ultrasound in Patients With Septic Shock Trial: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

August A LonginoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. August.Longino@cuanschutz.edu.
Katharine C MartinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Katarina R LeybaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Luke McCormackDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Gabriel SiegelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Vibhu M SharmaDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Matthew RiscintiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Carolina O LopezDepartment Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ivor S DouglasDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Edward A GillDepartment of Cardiology, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Colorado StARR Program in Medicine and Pediatrics (CSPMP)R38HL143511 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Steven Herbert Abman, Peter N. Buttrick · 2020 to 2026
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R38 HL143511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though the novel venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score is increasingly used as a noninvasive means of venous congestion measurement, the inter-rater reliability (IRR), inter-user reproducibility (IUR), and utility of concurrent ECG have not been evaluated. We conducted a multicenter study of the IRR, IUR, and utility of ECG for VExUS interpretation between four attending physicians of diverse specialties, reporting the Kappa statistic (KS) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for IRR and IUR for scans with and without ECG. Eighty-four paired VExUS exams from 42 patients, 60 of which had a concurrent ECG tracing, were interpreted. They showed substantial IRR, with a KS of 0.71 and ICC of 0.83 for the overall VExUS grade (p < 0.001), and IUR, with a KS 0.63 and ICC of 0.8. There was greater agreement among images with an ECG tracing. These results suggest that ECG-augmented VExUS may be a reliable and reproducible measure interpretable by clinicians with diverse backgrounds.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAdultAgedElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansHyperemiaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38858766
PMCPMC11165888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.