Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858749›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Surgical Handover Core Outcome Measures (SH-CORE): a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for trials in surgical handover.

Jessica M Ryan, Declan Devane, Anastasija Simiceva, Walter Eppich, Dara O Kavanagh, Christine Cullen, Aisling M Hogan, Deborah A McNamara

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica M RyanRCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Co. Dublin, Ireland. jessicaryan@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6161-9630
Declan DevaneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Áras Moyola, University of Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Anastasija SimicevaRCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Walter EppichDepartment of Medical Education and Collaboratory Practice Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Dara O KavanaghDepartment of Surgical Affairs, RCSI, 121 St. Stephen's Green, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Christine CullenPatient and Public Partner, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Aisling M HoganDepartment of General Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Deborah A McNamaraOffice of the President, RCSI, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Bon Secours Hospital in Dublin, Ireland, via the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) StAR MD Programme 22253A02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical handover is associated with a significant risk of care failures. Existing research displays methodological deficiencies and little consensus on the outcomes that should be used to evaluate interventions in this area. This paper reports a protocol to develop a core outcome set (COS) to support standardisation, comparability, and evidence synthesis in future studies of surgical handover between doctors.

methodsThis study adheres to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative guidance for COS development, including the COS-Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Reporting (COS-STAR) recommendations. It has been registered prospectively on the COMET database and will be led by an international steering group that includes surgical healthcare professionals, researchers, and patient and public partners. An initial list of reported outcomes was generated through a systematic review of interventions to improve surgical handover (PROSPERO: CRD42022363198). Findings of a qualitative evidence synthesis of patient and public perspectives on handover will augment this list, followed by a real-time Delphi survey involving all stakeholder groups. Each Delphi participant will then be invited to take part in at least one online consensus meeting to finalise the COS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) Research Ethics Committee (202309015, 7th November 2023). Results will be presented at surgical scientific meetings and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. A plain English summary will be disseminated through national websites and social media. The authors aim to integrate the COS into the handover curriculum of the Irish national surgical training body and ensure it is shared internationally with other postgraduate surgical training programmes. Collaborators will be encouraged to share the findings with relevant national health service functions and national bodies. DISCUSSION: This study will represent the first published COS for interventions to improve surgical handover, the first use of a real-time Delphi survey in a surgical context, and will support the generation of better-quality evidence to inform best practice.

trial registrationCore Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative 2675.  http://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2675 .

Indexed as

Patient HandoffSurgical Procedures, OperativeClinical Trials as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareStakeholder ParticipationConsensus methodCore outcome measureCore outcome setDelphi surveyHandoffHandoverHandover methodologyInformation transferI-PASSSBARSignoffSignoutSurgical communicationSurgical handover

Identifiers

PMID38858749
PMCPMC11165737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.