Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858686›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Patients and informal caregivers in the lead: a qualitative study on the experiences of patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals with involvement in treatment, e-health and self-management programs.

Matthijs H Bosveld, Anne G M Smits, Helena J M M Mertens, Michel J J M van Zandvoort, Walther N K A van Mook, Marloes A van Bokhoven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthijs H BosveldCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI; department of Family Medicine), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.bosveld@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-2842
Anne G M SmitsCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI; department of Family Medicine), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Helena J M M MertensMaastricht University Medical Centre+ (board of directors), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Michel J J M van ZandvoortMaastricht University Medical Centre+ (Academy), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Walther N K A van MookMaastricht University Medical Centre+ (department of Intensive Care), School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2398-8878
Marloes A van BokhovenCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI; department of Family Medicine), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-0978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of patients and informal caregivers favor an active role in decisions concerning their health. Simultaneously, governments aim to shift treatment from a professional care setting to a community setting, in light of an ageing population, a decreasing number of health workers and allocation of scarce resources. This transition of care solicits patients' and informal caregivers' ability to self-manage. Therefore, the Maastricht University Medical Centre + has established the Academy for Patients and Informal caregivers. The aim is to proactively and professionally support patients and their informal caregivers to enhance their self-management. For that, the Academy offers activities in three categories: (1) instruction of nursing techniques, (2) training of e-health competencies and (3) the provision of self-management programs. Both patients with an episodic care need, as well as patients and informal caregivers with chronic illness, are eligible to participate in the Academy's activities. However, little is known about the experience of these interventions from the perspective of patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 patients, 8 informal caregivers and 19 health care professionals who either participated in, referred to or received patients from the Academy. Topics revolved around self-management and the Quadruple aim, covering topics such as patient experiences, healthcare costs, health and well-being of the population and improving work life for health professionals. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsPatients and caregivers experienced an increase in the ability to manage health needs independently, leading to increased mental well-being and self-efficacy. They felt recognized as partners in care, although managing illness needs came with its own burdens. Health care professionals indicated that they felt assured of the quality, uniformity and availability of activities due to its central organization, with instruction nurses finding greater meaning in their work. On the level of health care systems, participants in this study mentioned a decrease in use of formal healthcare, whilst enabling a more equitable division of care.

conclusionStakeholders' experiences with the Academy for Patients and Informal caregivers indicate that participation contributes to development of self-management, whilst also improving working conditions, reducing the appeal to formal care and advancing equity in healthcare. The burden for patients and informal caregivers is to be considered in future developments.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth PersonnelQualitative ResearchSelf-ManagementAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient ParticipationTelemedicineInformal caregiversIntegrated carePatient participationSelf-managementSelf-management / methods*Shared decision making

Identifiers

PMID38858686
PMCPMC11165740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.