Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858664›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Supporting whānau during COVID-19 pandemic in Aotearoa New Zealand: a systems thinking case study.

Sudesh Sharma, Cheryl Davies, Helena Rattray-Te Mana, Michael Baker, Amanda Kvalsvig, Mat Walton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sudesh SharmaInstitute of Environmental Science and Research, 27 Creyke Road, Ilam, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand. sudesh.sharma@esr.cri.nz.
Cheryl DaviesKōkiri Marae Hauora and Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora A Eru Pōmare, University of Otago, 7-9 Barnes Street, Seaview, Lower Hutt , Wellington, 5010, New Zealand.
Helena Rattray-Te ManaInstitute of Environmental Science and Research, 34 Kenepuru Drive, Porirua, Wellington, 5022, New Zealand.
Michael BakerUniversity of Otago, 23A Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Amanda KvalsvigUniversity of Otago, 23A Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Mat WaltonInstitute of Environmental Science and Research, 34 Kenepuru Drive, Porirua, Wellington, 5022, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Aotearoa New Zealand COVID-19 pandemic response has been hailed as a success story, however, there are concerns about how equitable it has been. This study explored the experience of a collective of Māori health and social service providers in the greater Wellington region of Aotearoa New Zeland delivering COVID-19 responses.

methodsThe study was a collaboration between a large urban Māori health and social service provider, Tākiri Mai Te Ata whānau ora collective, and public health researchers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Two online workshops were held with staff of the Māori service provider, collectively developing a qualitative causal loop diagram and generating systemic insights. The causal loop diagram showed interactions of various factors affecting COVID-19 response for supporting whānau (Māori family/households) at a community level. The iceberg model of systems thinking offered insights for action in understanding causal loop diagrams, emphasizing impactful changes at less visible levels.

resultsSix interacting subsystems were identified within the causal loop diagram that highlighted the systemic barriers and opportunities for effective COVID-19 response to Māori whānau. The medical model of health service produces difficulties for delivering kaupapa Māori services. Along with pre-existing vulnerability and health system gaps, these difficulties increased the risk of negative impacts on Māori whānau as COVID-19 cases increased. The study highlighted a critical need to create equal power in health perspectives, reducing dominance of the individual-focused medical model for better support of whānau during future pandemics.

conclusionsThe study provided insights on systemic traps, their interactions and delays contributing to a relatively less effective COVID-19 response for Māori whānau and offered insights for improvement. In the light of recent changes in the Aotearoa New Zealand health system, the findings emphasize the urgent need for structural reform to address power imbalances and establish kaupapa Māori approach and equity as a norm in service planning and delivery.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services, IndigenousMaori PeopleHumansNew ZealandPandemicsSystems AnalysisAotearoa New ZealandCOVID-19EquityMāori service providerSystems thinkingWhānau

Identifiers

PMID38858664
PMCPMC11165734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.