ArticleBMC genomic data2024
Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes from four species in Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis.
Article in BMC genomic data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial genome of Quercus chenii: genomic features and evolutionary implications.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Chloroplast Functionality at the Interface of Growth, Defense, and Genetic Innovation: A Multi-Omics and Technological Perspective.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes from ten species inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Quercus L. species is widely recognized as a significant group in the broad-leaved evergreen forests of tropical and subtropical East Asia. These plants hold immense economic value for their use as firewood, furniture, and street trees. However, the identification of Quercus species is considered challenging, and the relationships between these species remain unclear. In this study, we sequenced and assembled the chloroplast (cp.) genomes of four Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis species (Quercus disciformis, Quercus dinghuensis, Quercus blackei, and Quercus hui). Additionally, we retrieved six published cp. genome sequences of Cyclobalanopsis species (Quercus fleuryi, Quercus pachyloma, Quercus ningangensis, Quercus litseoides, Quercus gilva, and Quercus myrsinifolia). Our aim was to perform comparative genomics and phylogenetic analyses of the cp. whole genome sequences of ten Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis species. The results revealed that: (1) Quercus species exhibit a typical tetrad structure, with the cp. genome lengths of the newly sequenced species (Q. disciformis, Q. dinghuensis, Q. blakei, and Q. hui) being 160,805 bp, 160,801 bp, 160,787 bp, and 160,806 bp, respectively; (2) 469 SSRs were detected, among which A/T base repeats were the most common; (3) no rearrangements or inversions were detected within the chloroplast genomes. Genes with high nucleotide polymorphism, such as rps14-psaB, ndhJ-ndhK, rbcL-accD, and rps19-rpl2_2, provided potential reference loci for molecular identification within the Cyclobalanopsis section; (4) phylogenetic analysis showed that the four sections of Cyclobalanopsis were grouped into sister taxa, with Q. hui being the first to diverge from the evolutionary branch and Q. disciformis being the most closely related to Q. blackei. The results of this study form the basis for future studies on taxonomy and phylogenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.