Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Electrospray deposition of physical unclonable functions for drug anti-counterfeiting.

Bryce J Kingsley, J David Schaffer, Paul R Chiarot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bryce J KingsleyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA.
J David SchafferInstitute for Justice and Well-Being, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA.
Paul R ChiarotDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA. pchiarot@binghamton.edu.

Funding

Binghamton University Interdisciplinary Collaboration Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, pharmaceutical counterfeiting has become an increasingly dangerous situation. A patient who unknowingly consumes a counterfeit drug is at a serious health risk. To address this problem, a low-cost and robust approach for authentication that can be administered at the point-of-care is required. Our proposed solution uses Optical Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs); patterns formed by a stochastic process that can be used for authentication. We create edible PUFs (ePUFs) using electrospray deposition, which utilizes strong electric fields to atomize a liquid suspension into a plume of micro-scale droplets that are delivered to the target. The ePUFs are electrospray-deposited from an edible ink directly onto the surface of the drug tablets. The process parameters (flow rate, translation speed, and suspension concentration) govern the characteristics of the ePUF to provide highly stochastic patterns. To evaluate our approach, 200 ePUFs were deposited onto tablets at various conditions, followed by imaging and storage of the patterns in a database. For ePUF authentication, a machine vision approach was created using the open source SIFT pattern matching algorithm. Using optimized pattern-matching constraints, our algorithm was shown to be 100% successful in authenticating the cellphone images of the ePUFs to the database. Additionally, the algorithm was found to be robust against changes in illumination and orientation of the cellphone images.

Indexed as

Counterfeit DrugsHumansTabletsCounterfeit DrugsTablets

Identifiers

PMID38858516
PMCPMC11164866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.