Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858475›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

ProteinCoLoc streamlines Bayesian analysis of colocalization in microscopic images.

Manuel Seefelder, Stefan Kochanek, Fabrice A C Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel SeefelderDepartment of Gene Therapy, Ulm University, 89081, Ulm, Germany. manuel.seefelder@uni-ulm.de.
Stefan KochanekDepartment of Gene Therapy, Ulm University, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Fabrice A C KleinDepartment of Gene Therapy, Ulm University, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

European Huntington's Disease Network 1245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colocalization, the spatial overlap of molecular entities, is often key to support their involvement in common functions. Existing colocalization tools, however, face limitations, particularly because of their basic statistical analysis and their low-throughput manual entry processes making them unsuitable for automation and potentially introducing bias. These shortcomings underscore the need for user-friendly tools streamlining colocalization assessments and enabling their robust and automated quantitative analyses. We have developed ProteinCoLoc, an innovative software designed for automated high-throughput colocalization analyses and incorporating advanced statistical features such as Bayesian modelling, automatic background detection and localised correlation analysis. ProteinCoLoc rationalises colocalization assessments without manual input, comes with a user-friendly graphical user interface and provides various analytics allowing to study and locally quantify colocalization. This easy-to-use application presents numerous advantages, including a direct comparison with controls employing a Bayesian model and the analysis of local correlation patterns, while reducing hands-on time through automatic background detection. The software was validated while studying the colocalization pattern of two proteins forming a stable complex: the huntingtin protein (HTT) and its partner huntingtin-associated protein 40 (HAP40). Our results showcase the software's capacity to quantitatively assess colocalizations. ProteinCoLoc is available both as a Julia package and as a compiled software ( https://github.com/ma-seefelder/ProteinCoLoc ).

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareHumans

Identifiers

PMID38858475
PMCPMC11164984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.