Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858424›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhanced microfluidic multi-target separation by positive and negative magnetophoresis.

Saud Khashan, Abdulkarem A Odhah, Marwan Taha, Anas Alazzam, Mohamed Al-Fandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saud KhashanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. sakhashan@just.edu.jo.
Abdulkarem A OdhahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Marwan TahaSystem on Chip Lab, Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Anas AlazzamSystem on Chip Lab, Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. anas.alazzam@ku.ac.ae.
Mohamed Al-FandiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.

Funding

Scientific Research and Innovation Support Fund (SRSF) ENG/1/13/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce magnetophoresis-based microfluidics for sorting biological targets using positive Magnetophoresis (pM) for magnetically labeled particles and negative Magnetophoresis (nM) for label-free particles. A single, externally magnetized ferromagnetic wire induces repulsive forces and is positioned across the focused sample flow near the main channel's closed end. We analyze magnetic attributes and separation performance under two transverse dual-mode magnetic configurations, examining magnetic fields, hydrodynamics, and forces on microparticles of varying sizes and properties. In pM, the dual-magnet arrangement (DMA) for sorting three distinct particles shows higher magnetic gradient generation and throughput than the single-magnet arrangement (SMA). In nM, the numerical results for SMA sorting of red blood cells (RBCs), white blood cells (WBCs), and prostate cancer cells (PC3-9) demonstrate superior magnetic properties and throughput compared to DMA. Magnetized wire linear movement is a key design parameter, allowing device customization. An automated device for handling more targets can be created by manipulating magnetophoretic repulsion forces. The transverse wire and magnet arrangement accommodate increased channel depth without sacrificing efficiency, yielding higher throughput than other devices. Experimental validation using soft lithography and 3D printing confirms successful sorting and separation, aligning well with numerical results. This demonstrates the successful sorting and separating of injected particles within a hydrodynamically focused sample in all systems. Both numerical and experimental findings indicate a separation accuracy of 100% across various Reynolds numbers. The primary channel dimensions measure 100 µm in height and 200 µm in width. N52 permanent magnets were employed in both numerical simulations and experiments. For numerical simulations, a remanent flux density of 1.48 T was utilized. In the experimental setup, magnets measuring 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.125 inches and 0.5 × 0.5 × 1 inch were employed. The experimental data confirm the device's capability to achieve 100% separation accuracy at a Reynolds number of 3. However, this study did not explore the potential impact of increased flow rates on separation accuracy.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell SeparationErythrocytesHumansHydrodynamicsLeukocytesMicrofluidicsContinuous separationMagnetic separationMagnetophoresisMicrofluidicsSeparation

Identifiers

PMID38858424
PMCPMC11164922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.