Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858369›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

The UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy and childhood hospital admissions for asthma in England.

Nina T Rogers, Steven Cummins, Catrin P Jones, Oliver T Mytton, Chrissy H Roberts, Seif O Shaheen, Syed Ahmar Shah, Aziz Sheikh, Martin White, Jean Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nina T RogersMRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK. nina.rogers@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1857-2122
Steven CumminsPopulation Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-4357
Catrin P JonesMRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-0513
Oliver T MyttonGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK.
Chrissy H RobertsClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1064-5980
Seif O ShaheenWolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Syed Ahmar ShahAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-0443
Aziz SheikhAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-6757
Jean AdamsMRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 16/49/01 and 16/130/01RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00006/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar sweetened beverage consumption has been suggested as a risk factor for childhood asthma symptoms. We examined whether the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), announced in March 2016 and implemented in April 2018, was associated with changes in National Health Service hospital admission rates for asthma in children, 22 months post-implementation of SDIL. We conducted interrupted time series analyses (2012-2020) to measure changes in monthly incidence rates of hospital admissions. Sub-analysis was by age-group (5-9,10-14,15-18 years) and neighbourhood deprivation quintiles. Changes were relative to counterfactual scenarios where the SDIL wasn't announced, or implemented. Overall, incidence rates reduced by 20.9% (95%CI: 29.6-12.2). Reductions were similar across age-groups and deprivation quintiles. These findings give support to the idea that implementation of a UK tax intended to reduce childhood obesity may have contributed to a significant unexpected and additional public health benefit in the form of reduced hospital admissions for childhood asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaCarbonated BeveragesHospitalizationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleHumansIncidenceInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMalePediatric ObesityRisk FactorsSugar-Sweetened BeveragesTaxes

Identifiers

PMID38858369
PMCPMC11164966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.