Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858307›Full record

ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2024

Assessment of Biological Damage Induced during Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination.

Amarja Pandurang Laad, Tamizh Selvan Gnanasekaran, Shashi Kumar Shetty, Savin Kotekar Vidyan, Sayali Satish Chodankar, Suchetha Kumari Nalilu, Vishakh Radhakrishna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amarja Pandurang LaadDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.
Tamizh Selvan GnanasekaranCentral Research Laboratory, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.
Shashi Kumar ShettyDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India. shettyshashi.research@gmail.com.
Savin Kotekar VidyanDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.
Sayali Satish ChodankarDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.
Suchetha Kumari NaliluDepartment of Biochemistry, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.
Vishakh RadhakrishnaCentral Research Laboratory, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India. vishakh.kedhilaya@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is known for its non-invasiveness, fast procedure, and also for providing detailed diagnostic information to physicians. It also utilises low-dose-rate ionising radiation (X-rays) as a source for imaging. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is an advanced system that uses iodinated contrast media for more accurate diagnostic results. Studies suggest using these contrasts will lead to greater radiation adsorption with significant DNA damage. No studies have been taken comparing the physical dose with the biological effect. The present study sheds light on the same by assessing the biological effect of CT with and without contrast intervention. The present study is timebound; thus, 21 participants attending for CT thorax and abdomen with no history of any cancer were included. The same participants underwent both pre-contrast and post-contrast studies. The blood sample was taken before the procedure and used as a control. Physical parameters like DLP and CTDI obtained from the instrument were compared with the MN frequency obtained (CBMN Assay). The study showed a significant increase (p-value < 0.05) in the Physical and MN frequency in the Post-Contrast group compared to the pre-contrast group. Although a positive correlation was observed between pre and post-contrast groups, the results were not found to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). The study confirms increased physical dose and MN frequency upon contrast intervention. This study recommends the judicial use of MDCT in disease diagnostics.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultDNA DamageFemaleHumansMaleMicronucleus TestsMiddle AgedRadiation DosageContrast MediaCBMN assayComputed tomographyIodinated contrastMultidetector computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38858307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.