Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858303›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2024

Choice enhances touch pleasantness.

Lenka Gorman, Wenhan Sun, Jyothisa Mathew, Zahra Rezazadeh, Justin Sulik, Merle Fairhurst, Ophelia Deroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lenka GormanCognition, Values, Behaviour Lab, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Lenka.Gorman@lmu.de.
Wenhan SunCognition, Values, Behaviour Lab, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jyothisa MathewInstitute for Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Zahra RezazadehFaculty of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Justin SulikCognition, Values, Behaviour Lab, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Merle FairhurstCentre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), 6G Life, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Ophelia DeroyCognition, Values, Behaviour Lab, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We value what we choose more than what is imposed upon us. Choice-induced preferences are extensively demonstrated using behavioural and neural methods, mainly involving rewarding objects such as money or material goods. However, the impact of choice on experiences, especially in the realm of affective touch, remains less explored. In this study, we specifically investigate whether choice can enhance the pleasure derived from affective touch, thereby increasing its intrinsic rewarding value. We conducted an experiment in which participants were being touched by an experimenter and asked to rate how pleasant their experience of touch was. They were given either a choice or no choice over certain touch stimulus variables which differed in their relevance: some were of low relevance (relating to the colour of the glove that the experimenter would use to touch them), while others were of high relevance (relating to the location on their arm where they would be stroked). Before and during touching, pupillometry was used to measure the level of arousal. We found that having a choice over aspects of tactile stimuli-especially those relevant to oneself-enhanced the pleasant perception of the touch. In addition, having a choice increases arousal in anticipation of touch. Regardless of how relevant it is to the actual tactile stimulus, allowing one to choose may positively enhance a person's perception of the physical contact they receive.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPleasureTouch PerceptionAdultArousalFemaleHumansMalePupilRewardTouchYoung AdultAffective touchChoiceControlEye movementReward

Identifiers

PMID38858303
PMCPMC11557629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.