Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858260›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Contrastive Learning vs. Self-Learning vs. Deformable Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation of Medical Images.

Hossein Arabi, Habib Zaidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7559-5297

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung SNSF 320030_176052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop a robust segmentation model, encoding the underlying features/structures of the input data is essential to discriminate the target structure from the background. To enrich the extracted feature maps, contrastive learning and self-learning techniques are employed, particularly when the size of the training dataset is limited. In this work, we set out to investigate the impact of contrastive learning and self-learning on the performance of the deep learning-based semantic segmentation. To this end, three different datasets were employed used for brain tumor and hippocampus delineation from MR images (BraTS and Decathlon datasets, respectively) and kidney segmentation from CT images (Decathlon dataset). Since data augmentation techniques are also aimed at enhancing the performance of deep learning methods, a deformable data augmentation technique was proposed and compared with contrastive learning and self-learning frameworks. The segmentation accuracy for the three datasets was assessed with and without applying data augmentation, contrastive learning, and self-learning to individually investigate the impact of these techniques. The self-learning and deformable data augmentation techniques exhibited comparable performance with Dice indices of 0.913 ± 0.030 and 0.920 ± 0.022 for kidney segmentation, 0.890 ± 0.035 and 0.898 ± 0.027 for hippocampus segmentation, and 0.891 ± 0.045 and 0.897 ± 0.040 for lesion segmentation, respectively. These two approaches significantly outperformed the contrastive learning and the original model with Dice indices of 0.871 ± 0.039 and 0.868 ± 0.042 for kidney segmentation, 0.872 ± 0.045 and 0.865 ± 0.048 for hippocampus segmentation, and 0.870 ± 0.049 and 0.860 ± 0.058 for lesion segmentation, respectively. The combination of self-learning with deformable data augmentation led to a robust segmentation model with no outliers in the outcomes. This work demonstrated the beneficial impact of self-learning and deformable data augmentation on organ and lesion segmentation, where no additional training datasets are needed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHippocampusMagnetic Resonance ImagingSemanticsBrain NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrastive-learningData augmentationDeep learningSegmentationSelf-learning

Identifiers

PMID38858260
PMCPMC11612072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.