ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Neuromonitoring in neonatal intensive care units-an important need towards individualized neuroprotective care.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromonitoring has been widely accepted as an important part in neonatal care. Amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are often mentioned in this context, though being only a part of the fully array of methods and examinations that could be considered neuromonitoring. Within the broad array of medical conditions that could be encountered in a neonatal patient, it is important to be aware of the indications for neuromonitoring and especially which neuromonitoring technique to use best for the individual condition. aEEG is now a widely accepted neuromonitor in neonatology with its value in hypoxic events and seizures only rarely questioned. Other methods like NIRS still have to prove themselves in the future. The SafeBoosC-III trial showed that it still remains difficult for some of these methods to prove their value for the improvement of outcome. Bute future developments such as multimodal neuromonitoring with data integration and artificial intelligence analysis could improve the value of these methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38858228What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.