Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858160›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Zipime-Weka-Schista study protocol: a longitudinal cohort study and economic evaluation of an integrated home-based approach for genital multipathogen screening in women, including female genital schistosomiasis, human papillomavirus, Trichomonas and HIV in Zambia.

Kwame Shanaube, Rhoda Ndubani, Helen Kelly, Emily Webb, Philippe Mayaud, Olimpia Lamberti, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, Nkatya Kasese, Amy Sturt, Lisette Van Lieshout and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kwame ShanaubeZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rhoda NdubaniZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Helen KellyDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-3807
Emily WebbEpidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Philippe MayaudDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Olimpia LambertiDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jennifer FitzpatrickZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nkatya KaseseZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Amy SturtDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, UK.
Lisette Van LieshoutLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Govert Van DamLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paul L A M CorstjensDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Barry KosloffZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Virginia BondZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Richard HayesEpidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Fern Terris-PrestholtLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Bonnie WebsterNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Bellington VwalikaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Isaiah HansingoGynecology, Livingstone Central Hospital, Livingstone, Zambia.
Helen AylesZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Amaya L BustinduyDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Amaya.Bustinduy@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6131-4159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultiplathogen home-based self-sampling offers an opportunity to increase access to screening and treatment in endemic settings with high coinfection prevalence of sexually transmitted (HIV, METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a longitudinal cohort study aiming to enrol 2500 non-pregnant, sexually active and non-menstruating women aged 15-50 years from two districts in Zambia with 2-year follow-up. During home visits, community health workers offer HIV and ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (UNZABREC) (reference: 1858-2021), the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (reference: 25258), Ministry of Health and local superintendents approved the study in September 2021.Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Identifiable data collected are stored securely and their confidentiality is protected in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHIV InfectionsMass ScreeningPapillomavirus InfectionsAdolescentAdultAnimalsCoinfectionFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedSchistosomiasis haematobiaSelf-TestingTrichomonas vaginalisadolescentcolposcopymolecular diagnosticsparasitologypublic healthsexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID38858160
PMCPMC11168163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.