Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858158›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Trends in C reactive protein testing: a retrospective cohort study in paediatric ambulatory care settings.

Mohammed Alkhmees, Ann Van Den Bruel, Gail Hayward, Marco H Blanker, Sarah Walker, Gea A Holtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed AlkhmeesDepartment of Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-6938
Ann Van Den BruelAcademic Centre of General Practice‎, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-2009
Gail HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-627X
Marco H BlankerDepartment of Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-8730
Sarah WalkerNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre‎, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford‎, UK.
Gea A HoltmanDepartment of Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands g.a.holtman@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-767X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to investigate C reactive protein (CRP) testing practices in paediatric ambulatory care across British primary care and accident and emergency (A&E) departments. DESIGN, SETTING,

participantsThis retrospective cohort study included children <18 years old having ≥1 CRP test at primary care or A&E departments in Oxfordshire between 2007 and 2021. OUTCOMES: We estimated the frequency and annual changes in CRP testing in both settings and evaluated referral and admission patterns based on CRP levels: low (<20 mg/L), intermediate or high (≥80 mg/L).

resultsOver 15 years, 91 540 CRP tests were requested in 63 226 children, with 33 882 (53.6%) in primary care and 29 344 (46.4%) in A&E. Both settings showed rising trends in test requests, with average annual percentage change of 3.0% (95% CI 1.2% to 4.7%) in primary care and 11.5% (95% CI 8.6% to 14.6%) in A&E. The proportion of intermediate/high-test results remained stable. In primary care, 50 709 (95.8%) of CRP tests were <20 mg/L, with 99.0% of these children managed at home. High and intermediate CRP values increased odds of referral versus low CRP (OR adjusted for age=21.80; 95% CI 16.49 to 28.81 and 4.77; 3.78 to 6.02, respectively). At A&E, 27 610 (71.5%) children had CRP<20 mg/L, of whom 42.5% were admitted while 3776 (9.8%) had CRP≥80 mg/L with 57.9% admission rate. High and intermediate CRP values increased odds of admission versus low CRP (OR adjusted for age=1.90; 95% CI 1.78 to 2.04 and 1.39; 1.32 to 1.46, respectively).

conclusionThere are rising trends of CRP test requests in paediatric ambulatory care settings, with no evidence of increases in proportion of intermediate/high-test results in primary care. Low CRP values at primary care were linked to children managed at home, while almost half of children with low CRP values at A&E were admitted to the hospital.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareC-Reactive ProteinPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesC-Reactive ProteinACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEEPIDEMIOLOGYPAEDIATRICS

Identifiers

PMID38858158
PMCPMC11168168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.