Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858149›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Pilot study to evaluate the use of remote patient monitoring to guide the timing of valve intervention in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (APRAISE-AS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial delivered in two tertiary cardiac centres in the UK.

Nazish Khan, Richard P Steeds, Derek Kyte, Larissa Fabritz, Philip Collis, Winnie Chua, Clive Stubbs, Samir Mehta, Yongzhong Sun, Mary Nulty and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nazish KhanDepartment of Cardiology (QEHB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK nazish.khan@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-7390
Richard P SteedsDepartment of Cardiology (QEHB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Derek KyteSchool of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-6741
Larissa FabritzDepartment of Cardiology (QEHB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Philip CollisInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Winnie ChuaDepartment of Cardiology (QEHB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-8813
Clive StubbsBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Samir MehtaBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Yongzhong SunBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mary NultyBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Katie KirkhamBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James M CottonDepartment of Cardiology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAortic stenosis (AS) is common affecting >13% of adults over the age of 75 years. In people who develop symptoms, without valve replacement, prognosis is dismal with mortality as high as 50% at 1 year. In asymptomatic patients, the timing of valve intervention is less well defined and a strategy of watchful waiting is recommended. Many, however, may develop symptoms and attribute this to age related decline, rather than worsening AS. Timely intervention in asymptomatic severe AS is critical, since delayed intervention often results in poor outcomes. Proactive surveillance of symptoms, quality of life and functional capacity should enable timely identification of people who will benefit from aortic valve replacement. There are no data however, to support the clinical and cost effectiveness of such an approach in a healthcare setting in the UK. The aim of this pilot trial is to test the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine the utility of proactive surveillance in people with asymptomatic severe AS to guide the timing of intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: APRAISE-AS is a multi-centre, non-blinded, two-arm, parallel group randomised controlled trial of up to 66 participants aged >18 years with asymptomatic severe AS. Participants will be randomised to either standard care or standard care supplemented with the APRAISE-AS intervention. Primary outcomes will capture; adherence to and participant acceptability of the intervention, recruitment and retention rates, and completeness of data collection. The findings will be used to inform the sample size and most appropriate outcome measure(s) for a full-scale RCT and health economic evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Black Country REC, reference: 22/WM/0214. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at local, regional and national meetings where appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19413194 registered on 14.07.2023.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineTertiary Care CentersTime-to-TreatmentUnited KingdomWatchful WaitingPatient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionValvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID38858149
PMCPMC11168151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.