Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38858140›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Evaluation of a unique and innovative diabetes care model in primary care in Ontario, Canada: protocol for a multiple-methods study with a convergent parallel design.

Maria Mathews, Rhiannon Lyons, Stewart Harris, Lindsay Hedden, Yun-Hee Choi, Jennifer Donnan, Michael E Green, Elisabeth Harvey, Sonja M Reichert, Bridget Ryan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada maria.mathews@schulich.uwo.ca.
Rhiannon LyonsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stewart HarrisDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Yun-Hee ChoiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer DonnanSchool of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-0804
Michael E GreenDepartments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Elisabeth HarveyPrimary Care Diabetes Support Program, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sonja M ReichertDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Bridget RyanDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Shannon SibbaldSchool of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie MeredithDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe growth and complexity of diabetes are exceeding the capacity of family physicians, resulting in the demand for community-based, interprofessional, primary care-led transition clinics. The Primary Care Diabetes Support Programme (PCDSP) in London, Ontario, is an innovative approach to diabetes care for high-risk populations, such as medically or socially complex and unattached patients. In this study, we will employ a quadruple-aim approach to evaluate the health system impacts of the PCDSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use multiple methods through a convergent parallel design in this project across five unique studies: a case study, a patient study, a provider study, a complications study and a cost-effectiveness study. The project will be conducted in a dedicated stand-alone clinic specialising in chronic disease management, specifically focusing on diabetes care. Participants will include clinic staff, administrators, family physicians, specialists and patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who received care at the clinic between 2011 and 2023. The project design will define the intervention, support replication at other sites or for other chronic diseases and address each of the quadruple aims and equity. Following the execution of the five individual studies, we will build a business case by integrating the results. Data will be analysed using both qualitative (content analysis and thematic analysis) and quantitative techniques (descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We received approval from the research ethics boards at Western University (reference ID: 2023-1 21 766; 2023-1 22 326) and Lawson Health Research Institute (reference ID: R-23-202). A privacy review was completed by St. Joseph's Healthcare Corporation. The findings will be shared among PCDSP staff and patients, stakeholders, academic researchers and the public through stakeholder sessions, conferences, peer-reviewed publications, infographics, posters, media interviews, social media and online discussions. For the patient and provider study, all participants will be asked to provide consent and are free to withdraw from the study, without penalty, until the data are combined. Participants will not be identified in any report or presentation except in the case study, for which, given the number of PCDSP providers, we will seek explicit consent to identify them.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansOntarioResearch DesignChronic DiseaseDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYHealth Care CostsHealth policyHealth ServicesPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID38858140
PMCPMC11168156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.