ArticleGenome research2024
Identifying genes within pathways in unannotated genomes with PaGeSearch.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In biological research, the identification and comparison of genes within specific pathways across the genomes of various species are invaluable. However, annotating the entire genome is resource intensive, and sequence similarity searches often yield results that are not actually genes. To address these limitations, we introduce Pathway Gene Search (PaGeSearch), a tool designed to identify genes from predefined lists, especially those in specific pathways, within genomes. The tool uses an initial sequence similarity search to identify relevant genomic regions, followed by targeted gene prediction and neural network-based result filtering. PaGeSearch suggests the regions that are most likely the orthologs of the genes in the query and is designed to be applicable for species within five classes: mammals, fish, birds, eudicotyledons, and Liliopsida. Compared with GeMoMa and miniprot, PaGeSearch generally outperforms in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value, as well as negative predictive value. Also, the exon coverage of gene models from PaGeSearch is higher compared with those in GeMoMa and miniprot. Although its performance shows increased variability when applied to actual biological pathways, it nonetheless maintains an acceptable level of accuracy. Evaluating PaGeSearch across different assembly levels, chromosome, scaffold, and contig shows minimal variation in outcomes, indicating that PaGeSearch is resilient to variations in assembly quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.