Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38857789›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2024

Mechanistic insights into medulloblastoma relapse.

Kendell Peterson, Maria Turos-Cabal, April D Salvador, Isabel Palomo-Caturla, Ashley J Howell, Megan E Vieira, Sean M Greiner, Thibaut Barnoud, Jezabel Rodriguez-Blanco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kendell PetersonDarby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Maria Turos-CabalDarby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
April D SalvadorDarby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Isabel Palomo-CaturlaDepartment of Pediatrics, Virginia Tech School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Ashley J HowellDarby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Megan E VieiraDarby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Sean M GreinerDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thibaut BarnoudDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Jezabel Rodriguez-BlancoDarby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: rblanco@musc.edu.

Funding

Identifying Novel Therapeutics for High Risk Medulloblastoma PatientsK01NS119351 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RODRIGUEZ-BLANCO, JEZABEL · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
Genetics of Tumor Suppression by p53R00CA241367 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BARNOUD, THIBAUT · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA241367NINDS NIH HHS K01 NS119351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children, with medulloblastoma (MB) being the most common type. A better understanding of these malignancies has led to their classification into four major molecular subgroups. This classification not only facilitates the stratification of clinical trials, but also the development of more effective therapies. Despite recent progress, approximately 30% of children diagnosed with MB experience tumor relapse. Recurrent disease in MB is often metastatic and responds poorly to current therapies. As a result, only a small subset of patients with recurrent MB survive beyond one year. Due to its dismal prognosis, novel therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing or managing recurrent disease are urgently needed. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind treatment failure in MB, as well as those characterizing recurrent cases. We also propose avenues for how these findings can be used to better inform personalized medicine approaches for the treatment of newly diagnosed and recurrent MB. Lastly, we discuss the treatments currently being evaluated for MB patients, with special emphasis on those targeting MB by subgroup at diagnosis and relapse.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsMedulloblastomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChildHumansPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsMedulloblastomaPediatric brain tumorsPersonalized medicineRecurrenceRelapseResistanceStem cellsTargeted therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID38857789
PMCPMC11270902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.