Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38857454›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

RefAI: a GPT-powered retrieval-augmented generative tool for biomedical literature recommendation and summarization.

Yiming Li, Jeff Zhao, Manqi Li, Yifang Dang, Evan Yu, Jianfu Li, Zenan Sun, Usama Hussein, Jianguo Wen, Ahmed M Abdelhameed and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Searching the druggable genome using large language models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Searching the Druggable Genome using Large Language Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Yiming LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8784-1745
Jeff ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States.
Manqi LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Yifang DangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-2957
Evan YuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Jianfu LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Zenan SunMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1577-874X
Usama HusseinDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Jianguo WenMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Ahmed M AbdelhameedDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Junhua MaiDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Shenduo LiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Yue YuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Xinyue HuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Daowei YangDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Jingna FengDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Zehan LiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Jianping HeMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Wei TaoDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Tiehang DuanDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Yanyan LouDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Fang LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8865-7717
Cui TaoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-1924

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
VIOLIN 2.0: Vaccine Information and Ontology LInked kNowledgebaseU24AI171008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yongqun He, Junguk Hur · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
American Heart Association 19GPSGC35180031Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RP220244National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health R01AI130460NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI171008NIH HHS R01AI130460NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093the American Heart Association 19GPSGC35180031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrecise literature recommendation and summarization are crucial for biomedical professionals. While the latest iteration of generative pretrained transformer (GPT) incorporates 2 distinct modes-real-time search and pretrained model utilization-it encounters challenges in dealing with these tasks. Specifically, the real-time search can pinpoint some relevant articles but occasionally provides fabricated papers, whereas the pretrained model excels in generating well-structured summaries but struggles to cite specific sources. In response, this study introduces RefAI, an innovative retrieval-augmented generative tool designed to synergize the strengths of large language models (LLMs) while overcoming their limitations. MATERIALS AND

methodsRefAI utilized PubMed for systematic literature retrieval, employed a novel multivariable algorithm for article recommendation, and leveraged GPT-4 turbo for summarization. Ten queries under 2 prevalent topics ("cancer immunotherapy and target therapy" and "LLMs in medicine") were chosen as use cases and 3 established counterparts (ChatGPT-4, ScholarAI, and Gemini) as our baselines. The evaluation was conducted by 10 domain experts through standard statistical analyses for performance comparison.

resultsThe overall performance of RefAI surpassed that of the baselines across 5 evaluated dimensions-relevance and quality for literature recommendation, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and reference integration for summarization, with the majority exhibiting statistically significant improvements (P-values <.05). DISCUSSION: RefAI demonstrated substantial improvements in literature recommendation and summarization over existing tools, addressing issues like fabricated papers, metadata inaccuracies, restricted recommendations, and poor reference integration.

conclusionBy augmenting LLM with external resources and a novel ranking algorithm, RefAI is uniquely capable of recommending high-quality literature and generating well-structured summaries, holding the potential to meet the critical needs of biomedical professionals in navigating and synthesizing vast amounts of scientific literature.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsInformation Storage and RetrievalPubMedNatural Language Processinggenerative pretrained transformerlarge language modelliterature recommendationretrieval-augmented generationtext summarization

Identifiers

PMID38857454
PMCPMC11339508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.