Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38857393›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Nationwide law enforcement impact on the pet bird trade in China.

Zhijian Liang, Sifan Hu, Jia Zhong, Qian Wei, Xiangdong Ruan, Li Zhang, Tien Ming Lee, Yang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using customs data to understand overlooked trade in non-CITES birds between Africa and Asia.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhijian LiangSchool of Ecology and State Key Laboratory of Biological Control, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-8801
Sifan HuSchool of Ecology and State Key Laboratory of Biological Control, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7445-6284
Jia ZhongChina Birdwatching Association, Kunming, Yunnan 650225, People's Republic of China.
Qian WeiChina Birdwatching Association, Kunming, Yunnan 650225, People's Republic of China.
Xiangdong RuanAcademy of Inventory and Planning, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhangKey Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9006-9970
Tien Ming LeeSchool of Ecology and State Key Laboratory of Biological Control, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-9358
Yang LiuSchool of Ecology and State Key Laboratory of Biological Control, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4580-5518

Funding

Interdisciplinary Innovation Team of the Chinese Academy of Sciences xbzg-zdsys-202207National High-level Talent Program of China 41180953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation enforcement is a direct strategy to combat illegal wildlife trade in open markets. Yet, its large-scale effectiveness has not been widely assessed due to the lack of extensive market data. Between August 2016 and June 2017, a national coordinated enforcement campaign led by the leading Chinese authority to combat illegal migratory bird trade coincided with the largest-ever pet bird market survey across China by voluntary birdwatchers before and after the enforcement, which served as a unique natural experiment. Across 73 markets from 22 Chinese provinces, the dataset contains 140,723 birds of 346 species from 48 families and recorded a drastic decline in bird abundance traded after enforcement. Notably, species protected under China's Wildlife Protection Law declined significantly, while commercially bred species increased, although responses to enforcement were spatially heterogeneous. Our model showed that the national protection level was the best predictor for the trend of traded species, even after accounting for confounding factors such as regional baseline enforcement pressure and wild native bird populations. However, the widely traded native songbirds were not offered adequate national protection. Future policies should consider the pet bird trade patterns, target key areas of trade, and develop a more systematic market survey design to monitor trade.

Indexed as

BirdsCommerceConservation of Natural ResourcesLaw EnforcementPetsAnimalsAnimals, WildChinaAsian songbird crisisbird marketconservation enforcementillegal wildlife trademarket survey

Identifiers

PMID38857393
PMCPMC11194575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.