ArticleSpine2025
Ten-Year Heterogeneity of Minimal Important Change and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lumbar Fusions.
Article in Spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- External validity and responsiveness of lumbar spinal stenosis-specific symptom and QOL scales: A multicenter prospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCohort study.
objectiveTo evaluate heterogeneity (fluctuation) in minimal important change (MIC) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) through 10 years after lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PROMs have become key determinants in spine surgery outcomes studies. MIC and PASS were established to aid PROM interpretations. However, their long-term stability has not yet been reported.
methodsA consecutive series of elective lumbar fusions were followed up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Improvement was rated by a 4-point Likert scale into "improved" or "nonimproved." Satisfaction-to-treatment was rated by the patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis estimated MIC (95% confidence interval, CI) as the PROM change that best predicted improvement at distinct time-points. PASS (CI) was estimated as the lowest PROM score at which the patients were still satisfied. Heterogeneity across thresholds was evaluated using the DeLong algorithm.
resultsMIC for ODI represented heterogeneity across 10 years, ranging from -21 (-24 to -16) at two years to -8 (-7 to -4) at five years, P<0.001. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) (0.79 to 0.85) indicated acceptable to excellent discrimination. Heterogeneity was not significant in the MICs for the pain scores. At one year, MIC for back pain was -24 (-38 to -15), AUC 0.77, and for leg pain, it was -26 (-44 to -8), AUC 0.78. No significant heterogeneity was observed in 10-year PASS scores. At 1-year, PASS for ODI was 22 (15 to 29), AUC 0.85. Similarly, the one-year PASS for back pain was 38 (20 to 56), AUC 0.81, and for leg pain, it was 49 (26 to 72), AUC 0.81.
conclusionsMIC for ODI fluctuated over 10 years after lumbar fusions. PASS values for all PROMs seemed most stable over time. Caution is needed when generic MIC values are used in long-term studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.