ArticlePloS one2024
Sources of diagnostic delay for people with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: Qualitative research study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An adapted health system access framework for avoidable inflammatory bowel disease admissions: a scoping review.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Review
- Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Burden and Predictors of Repeat Diagnostic Upper Endoscopy for Abdominal Pain, Heartburn, and Dysphagia in General Gastroenterology.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Delays in Diagnosing Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Korea: Impact on Disease Severity and the Need for Early Recognition.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Possible underdiagnosis of ulcerative colitis in tertiary care can affect medication use and access to healthcare facilities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Clinical Implication of S100A9 in Ulcerative Colitis and Its Progression to Cancer: A Journey from Inflammation to Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence as a Tool in Diagnosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Addressing diagnostic delays in inflammatory bowel diseases in Germany.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAn improved understanding of the causes and experience of diagnostic delay in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
methodsFramework analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 adults with IBD.
resultsParticipants' prior knowledge of normal bowel function/IBD was limited. Symptoms were sometimes misattributed to mild/transient conditions or normalised until intolerable. Family pressures, work, education, mistrust of doctors, fear and embarrassment could exacerbate delays. Poor availability of face-to-face appointments deterred people from seeing a GP. Patients feared that by the time they got to see their GP, their symptoms would have resolved. Patients instead self-managed symptoms, but often regretted not seeking help earlier. Limited time in consultations, language barriers, embarrassment, and delays in test results subsequently delayed specialist referrals. GPs misattributed symptoms to other conditions due to atypical or non-specific presentations, leading to reduced trust in health systems. Patients complained of poor communication, delays in accessing test results, appointments, and onward referrals-all associated with clinical deterioration. GPs were sometimes unable to 'fast-track' patients into specialist care. Consultations and endoscopies were often difficult experiences for patients, especially for non-English speakers who are also less likely to receive information on mental health support and the practicalities of living with IBD.
conclusionsThe framework analysis demonstrates delay in the diagnosis of IBD at each stage of the patient journey. RECOMMENDATIONS: Greater awareness of IBD amongst the general population would facilitate presentation to healthcare services through symptom recognition by individuals and community advice. Greater awareness in primary care would help ensure IBD is included in differential diagnosis. In secondary care, greater attention to the wider needs of patients is needed-beyond diagnosis and treatment. All clinicians should consider atypical presentations and the fluctuating nature of IBD. Diagnostic overshadowing is a significant risk-where other diagnoses are already in play the risk of delay is considerable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.