Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38857221›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays.

Miranda A Lewis, Ketki Patil, Khalil Ettayebi, Mary K Estes, Robert L Atmar, Sasirekha Ramani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Advances in Cytotoxicity Testing: From In Vitro Assays to In Silico Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miranda A LewisDepartment of Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Ketki PatilDepartment of Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Khalil EttayebiDepartment of Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Mary K EstesDepartment of Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Robert L AtmarDepartment of Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Sasirekha RamaniDepartment of Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-8534

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Suzanne AW Fuqua · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
X-ray Crystallographic Studies on CalicivirusesP01AI057788 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PRASAD, BIDADI VENKATARAM · 2004 to 2024
$34.4M
Viral Diversity and Pathogenicity in Mucosal Respiratory and Gastrointestinal DiseaseU19AI144297 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ESTES, MARY KOLB, GIBBS, RICHARD A · 2019 to 2024
$30.1M
Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Hashem B El-Serag · 2001 to 2026
$28.3M
Novel Platforms for Human Intestinal Enteroids: Matrix, Mechanics, and TopographyU19AI116497 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MARESSO, ANTHONY W · 2015 to 2025
$13.2M
Training Interdisciplinary Pharmacology Scientists (TIPS)T32GM139801 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Carmen W. Dessauer · 2021 to 2026
$1.5M
BD Biosciences Special Order LSRIIS10RR024574 · NCRR · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2009 to 2009
$430k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR024574NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI057788NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI116497NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI144297NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro models, such as primary cells and continuous cell lines routinely used for evaluating drug candidates, have limitations in their translational relevance to human diseases. Organotypic cultures are increasingly being used to assess therapeutics for various cancers and infectious diseases. Monitoring drug cytotoxicity in cell cultures is crucial in drug development, and several commercially available kits for cytotoxicity assessment offer distinct advantages and limitations. Given the complexity of organoid cultures, including donor-driven variability, we investigated drug-treated, tissue stem cell-derived human intestinal organoid responses with commonly used cell cytotoxicity assay kits. Using seven different compounds, we compared the cytotoxicity assay performance of two different leaky membrane-based and two metabolism-based assays. Significant variability was seen in reported viability outcomes across assays and organoid lines. High baseline activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in four human intestinal organoid lines required modification of the standard LDH assay protocol. Additionally, the LDH assay reported unique resilience to damage in a genetically-modified line contrasting results compared to other assays. This study highlights factors that can impact the measurement of cell cytotoxicity in intestinal organoid models, which are emerging as valuable new tools for research and pre-clinical drug testing and suggest the need for using multiple assay types to ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessment.

Indexed as

L-Lactate DehydrogenaseOrganoidsCell SurvivalHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesL-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID38857221
PMCPMC11164375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.