ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2024
Characterization of Blow-Spun Polyurethane Scaffolds-Influence of Fiber Alignment and Fiber Diameter on Pericyte Growth.
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic HA-Reinforced PCL/PLA Fibrous Structures via Solution Blow Spinning: Cocoon-Inspired Design for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Polyurethanes in Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Statistical analysis of the measured strength parameters of the fresh main intracranial arteries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, fibrous polyurethane (PU) materials with average fiber diameter of 200, 500, and 1000 nm were produced using a solution blow spinning (SBS) process. The effects of the rotation speed of the collector (in the range of 200-25 000 rpm) on the fiber alignment and diameter were investigated. The results showed that fiber alignment was influenced by the rotation speed of the collector, and such alignment was possible when the fiber diameter was within a specific range. Homogeneously oriented fibers were obtained only for a fiber diameter ≥500 nm. Moreover, the changes in fiber orientation and fiber diameter (resulting from changes in the rotation speed of the collector) were more noticeable for materials with an average fiber diameter of 1000 nm in comparison to 500 nm, which suggests that the larger the fiber diameter, the better the controlled architectures that can be obtained. The porosity of the produced scaffolds was about 65-70%, except for materials with a fiber diameter of 1000 nm and aligned fibers, which had a higher porosity (76%). Thus, the scaffold pore size increased with increasing fiber diameter but decreased with increasing fiber alignment. The mechanical properties of fibrous materials strongly depend on the direction of stretching, whereby the fiber orientation influences the mechanical strength only for materials with a fiber diameter of 1000 nm. Furthermore, the fiber diameter and alignment affected the pericyte growth. Significant differences in cell growth were observed after 7 days of cell culture between materials with a fiber diameter of 1000 nm (cell coverage 96-99%) and those with a fiber diameter of 500 nm (cell coverage 70-90%). By appropriately setting the SBS process parameters, scaffolds can be easily adapted to the cell requirements, which is of great importance in producing complex 3D structures for guided tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.