Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38856888›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2024

Types of Short-Duration Electrical Stimulation-Induced Efficiency in the Axonal Regeneration and Recovery: Comparative in Vivo Study in Rat Model of Repaired Sciatic Nerve and its Tibial Branch after Transection Injury.

Sareh Naseri, Hosein Samaram, Nadia Naghavi, Morteza Behnam Rassouli, Maryam Mousavinezhad

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sareh NaseriElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan Province, 9177948374, Iran.
Hosein SamaramElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan Province, 9177948374, Iran.
Nadia NaghaviElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan Province, 9177948374, Iran. nn.naghavi@gmail.com.
Morteza Behnam RassouliBiology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Maryam MousavinezhadBiology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration of adequate function and sensation in nerves following an injury is often insufficient. Electrical stimulation (ES) applied during nerve repair can promote axon regeneration, which may enhance the likelihood of successful functional recovery. However, increasing operation time and complexity are associated with limited clinical use of ES. This study aims to better assess whether short-duration ES types (voltage mode vs. current mode) are able to produce enhanced regenerative activity following peripheral nerve repair in rat models. Wistar rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: no ES (control), 30-minute ES with a current pulse, and 30-minute ES with a voltage pulse. All groups underwent sciatic nerve transection and repair using a silicone tube to bridge the 6-mm gap between the stumps. In the 2 groups other than the control, ES was applied after the surgical repair. Outcomes were evaluated using electrophysiology, histology, and serial walking track analysis. Biweekly walking tracks test over 12 weeks revealed that subjects that underwent ES experienced more rapid functional improvement than subjects that underwent repair alone. Electrophysiological analysis of the newly intratubular sciatic nerve at week 12 revealed strong motor function recovery in rats that underwent 30-minute ES. Histologic analysis of the sciatic nerve and its tibial branch at 12 weeks demonstrated robust axon regrowth in all groups. Both types of short-duration ES applied during nerve repair can promote axon regrowth and enhance the chances of successful functional recovery.

Indexed as

AxonsNerve RegenerationRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionSciatic NerveAnimalsElectric StimulationElectric Stimulation TherapyMaleRatsTibial NerveCurrent PulseElectrical StimulationPeripheral Nerve InjurySciatic Nerve TransectionTibialVoltage Pulse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.