Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38856830›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Frailty Increases Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Oncological Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sorinel Lunca, Stefan Morarasu, Kevin Rouet, Andreea Antonina Ivanov, Bianca Codrina Morarasu, Cristian Ene Roata, Cillian Clancy, Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Multimorbidity in liver surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sorinel Lunca2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Stefan MorarasuGrigore T Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Iasi, Romania. morarasu.stefan@gmail.com.
Kevin Rouet2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Andreea Antonina Ivanov2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Bianca Codrina MorarasuGrigore T Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Iasi, Romania.
Cristian Ene Roata2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.
Cillian ClancyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidered to reflect a patients' biological age, frailty is a new syndrome shown to predict surgical outcomes in elderly patients. In view of the increasing age at which patients are proposed oncological liver surgery and the morbidity associated with it, we attempted to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare morbidity and mortality between frail and nonfrail patients after liver resections.

methodsThe study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all comparative studies examining surgical outcomes after liver resections between frail and nonfrail patients.

resultsTen studies were included based on the selection criteria with a total of 71,102 patients, split into two groups: frail (n = 17,167) and the control group (n = 53,928). There were more elderly patients with a lower preoperative albumin level in the frail group (p = 0.02, p = 0.001). Frail patients showed higher rates of morbidity with more major complications and a higher incidence of postoperative liver failure (p < 0.001). Mortality (p < 0.001) and readmission rate (p = 0.021) also was higher in frail patients.

conclusionsFrailty seems to be a solid predictive risk factor of morbidity and mortality after liver surgery and should be considered a selection criterion for liver surgery in at-risk patients.

Indexed as

FrailtyHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsFrail ElderlyHumansMorbidityPrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival RateFrailtyHepatectomyLiver cancerMorbiditySurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID38856830
PMCPMC11413144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.