ReviewTranslational stroke research2025
Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review of Standard and Advanced Imaging Techniques.
Review in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A wide-necked saccular aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation with neck atherosclerosis mimicking a fusiform aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Mammalian Ste20-like kinase 1 regulates AMPK to mitigate the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- High-resolution vessel wall imaging-driven radiomic analysis for the precision prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk: a promising approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of intracranial aneurysms is dictated by its risk of rupture in the future. Several clinical and radiological risk factors for aneurysm rupture have been described and incorporated into prediction models. Despite the recent technological advancements in aneurysm imaging, linear length and visible irregularity with a bleb are the only radiological measure used in clinical prediction models. The purpose of this article is to summarize both the standard imaging techniques, including their limitations, and the advanced techniques being used experimentally to image aneurysms. It is expected that as our understanding of advanced techniques improves, and their ability to predict clinical events is demonstrated, they become an increasingly routine part of aneurysm assessment. It is important that neurovascular specialists understand the spectrum of imaging techniques available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38856829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.