ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2024
Contrast-enhanced 3D black-blood magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Pathophysiologic Insights, Clinical Evaluation Tools, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is often under-recognized on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations without concomitant magnetic resonance venography (MRV). Contrast-enhanced black-blood MRI (BBMRI) based on a three-dimensional T1-weighted variable-flip-angle turbo spin echo sequence, one of the sequences used routinely in our practice, has the potential for detection of thrombi in patients with CVT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional BBMRI for the diagnosis of CVT. MATERIALS AND
methodsContrast-enhanced BBMRI and contrast-enhanced MRV sequences of 64 patients, acquired from June 2018 to January 2021, were retrospectively reviewed by neuroradiologists for detection of CVT in each venous sinus segment. Diagnostic performance values were calculated for contrast-enhanced BBMRI based on enhancement patterns.
resultsOf 749 venous segments from 64 patients analyzed, CVT was demonstrated in 41 venous segments from 12 patients on contrast-enhanced MRV (CE MRV). Thick wall enhancement and total enhancement patterns were dominantly demonstrated in thrombosed segments. Compared with contrast-enhanced MRV, contrast-enhanced BBMRI had a patient-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1%, respectively, and a segment-based sensitivity and specificity of 87.8% and 96.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of contrast-enhanced BBMRI in detecting CVT was 92.3% (patient-based) and 57.1% (segment-based), and the negative predictive value was 100% (patient-based) and 99.3% (segment-based).
conclusionContrast-enhanced BBMRI has high diagnostic performance in detection and diagnosis of CVT. This sequence may be useful to recognize CVT when dedicated CE MRV was not performed in patients with nonspecific neurological symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.