ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Improved prediction of DNA and RNA binding proteins with deep learning models.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- TransFactor-prediction of pro-viral SARS-CoV-2 host factors using a protein language model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- DRBP-EDP: classification of DNA-binding proteins and RNA-binding proteins using ESM-2 and dual-path neural network.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PLM-DBPs: enhancing plant DNA-binding protein prediction by integrating sequence-based and structure-aware protein language models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Accurate prediction of nucleic acid binding proteins using protein language model.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleic acid-binding proteins (NABPs), including DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), play important roles in essential biological processes. To facilitate functional annotation and accurate prediction of different types of NABPs, many machine learning-based computational approaches have been developed. However, the datasets used for training and testing as well as the prediction scopes in these studies have limited their applications. In this paper, we developed new strategies to overcome these limitations by generating more accurate and robust datasets and developing deep learning-based methods including both hierarchical and multi-class approaches to predict the types of NABPs for any given protein. The deep learning models employ two layers of convolutional neural network and one layer of long short-term memory. Our approaches outperform existing DBP and RBP predictors with a balanced prediction between DBPs and RBPs, and are more practically useful in identifying novel NABPs. The multi-class approach greatly improves the prediction accuracy of DBPs and RBPs, especially for the DBPs with ~12% improvement. Moreover, we explored the prediction accuracy of single-stranded DNA binding proteins and their effect on the overall prediction accuracy of NABP predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.