Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38856168›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Improved prediction of DNA and RNA binding proteins with deep learning models.

Siwen Wu, Jun-Tao Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siwen WuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Jun-Tao GuoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5949-8948

Funding

Investigation of ssDNA binding proteins and protein-ssDNA interactionsR15GM132846 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI GUO, JUN-TAO · 2021 to 2021
$436k
National Science Foundation DBI-2051491NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM132846NIH HHS R15GM132846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid-binding proteins (NABPs), including DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), play important roles in essential biological processes. To facilitate functional annotation and accurate prediction of different types of NABPs, many machine learning-based computational approaches have been developed. However, the datasets used for training and testing as well as the prediction scopes in these studies have limited their applications. In this paper, we developed new strategies to overcome these limitations by generating more accurate and robust datasets and developing deep learning-based methods including both hierarchical and multi-class approaches to predict the types of NABPs for any given protein. The deep learning models employ two layers of convolutional neural network and one layer of long short-term memory. Our approaches outperform existing DBP and RBP predictors with a balanced prediction between DBPs and RBPs, and are more practically useful in identifying novel NABPs. The multi-class approach greatly improves the prediction accuracy of DBPs and RBPs, especially for the DBPs with ~12% improvement. Moreover, we explored the prediction accuracy of single-stranded DNA binding proteins and their effect on the overall prediction accuracy of NABP predictions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningDNA-Binding ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDNA-Binding ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteinsconvolutional neural network (CNN)double-stranded DNA binding protein (DSB)long short-term memory (LSTM)multi-class modelRNA binding protein (RBP)single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB)

Identifiers

PMID38856168
PMCPMC11163377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.