Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855791›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2024

An annotated catalogue of selected historical type specimens, including genetic data, housed in the Natural History Museum Vienna.

Anja Palandačić, Min J Chai, Gennadiy A Shandikov, Nesrine Akkari, Pedro R Frade, Susanne Randolf, Hans-Martin Berg, Ernst Mikschi, Nina G Bogutskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anja PalandačićFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-5240
Min J ChaiFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6213-2973
Gennadiy A ShandikovFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Nesrine AkkariMyriapoda collection, Third Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5019-4833
Pedro R FradeFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-255X
Susanne RandolfFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-3077
Hans-Martin BergFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Ernst MikschiFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Nina G BogutskayaFish collection, First Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-0095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Museum collections are an important source for resolving taxonomic issues and species delimitation. Type specimens as name-bearing specimens, traditionally used in morphology-based taxonomy, are, due to the progress in historical DNA methodology, increasingly used in molecular taxonomic studies. Museum collections are subject to constant deterioration and major disasters. The digitisation of collections offers a partial solution to these problems and makes museum collections more accessible to the wider scientific community. The Extended Specimen Approach (ESA) is a method of digitisation that goes beyond the physical specimen to include the historical information stored in the collection. The collections of the Natural History Museum Vienna represent one of the largest non-university research centres in Europe and, due to their size and numerous type specimens, are frequently used for taxonomic studies by visiting and resident scientists. Recently, a version of ESA was presented in the common catalogue of the Fish and Evertebrata Varia collections and extended to include genetic information on type specimens in a case study of a torpedo ray. Here the case study was extended to a heterogeneous selection of historical type series from different collections with the type locality of Vienna. The goal was to apply the ESA, including genetic data on a selected set of type material: three parasitic worms, three myriapods, two insects, twelve fishes, and one bird species. Five hundred digital items (photographs, X-rays, scans) were produced, and genetic analysis was successful in eleven of the 21 type series. In one case a complete mitochondrial genome was assembled, and in another case ten short fragments (100-230 bp) of the cytochrome oxidase I gene were amplified and sequenced. For five type series, genetic analysis confirmed their taxonomic status as previously recognised synonyms, and for one the analysis supported its status as a distinct species. For two species, genetic information was provided for the first time. This catalogue thus demonstrates the usefulness of ESA in providing digitised data of types that can be easily made available to scientists worldwide for further study.

Indexed as

Biodiversitydigitisationhistorical DNAtype locality Viennazoological collections

Identifiers

PMID38855791
PMCPMC11161686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.