ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024
Shear wave elastography for solid breast masses evaluation: Quantitative measurement of mean elasticity value and elasticity ratio.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of elastography (Shear-Wave and Elasticity Index) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: a retrospective study in Peru.Radiology and oncology · 2026Observational
- Clinical Value of Nomogram Model based on Multimodality Ultrasound Image Characteristics Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Shear wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasonographic technique to measure the elasticity of mass lesions to evaluate breast mass. This study aimed to find out the cutoff values identifying breast malignancy using the mean elasticity (E-mean) and elasticity ratio (E-ratio) of breast masses. Methods: This retrospective study included women underwent SWE and US-guided biopsy of breast masses. During conventional US, the SWE mode was also performed, determining elasticity measurements, E-mean and E-ratio. Histopathological reports were obtained to identify mass status. The optimal and alternative cutoff values for E-mean and E-ratio to determine malignancy were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Youden's index score. Results: Among 147 benign and 93 malignant masses, the median of E-means were 26.20 (IQR 15.70-56.60) and 141.60 (IQR 119.80-154.60) kPa and the median E-ratios were 3.11 (IQR 1.83-5.23) and 9.24 (IQR 6.76-12.44), respectively. Using Youden's index, the optimal cutoff values for E-mean and E-ratio were 90.35 and 5.89, with sensitivity of 87.1 % and 82.8 %, specificity of 89.1 % and 83.7 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.5 % and 76.2 %, negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.6 % and 88.5 %, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 8.00 and 5.07, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.14 and 0.21, respectively. Conclusion: This study revealed that SWE is useful in predicting malignancy. With the optimal cutoff values of E-mean and E-ratio at 90.35 kPa and 5.89, the sensitivity was nearly 90 % with E-mean and slightly over 80 % with E-ratio, respectively. These findings could be used in conjunction with conventional US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.