Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855667›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Theoretical and experimental determination of the confocal function of OCT systems for accurate calculation of sample optical properties.

Gijs Buist, Maddalena Debiasi, Arjen Amelink, Johannes F de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gijs BuistLaserLaB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2669-0200
Maddalena DebiasiLaserLaB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1096-0819
Arjen AmelinkLaserLaB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0374-4224
Johannes F de BoerLaserLaB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1253-4950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attenuation coefficient of biological tissue could serve as an indicator of structural and functional changes related to the onset or progression of disease. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides cross sectional images of tissue up to a depth of a few millimeters, based on the local backscatter properties. The OCT intensity also depends on the confocal function, which needs to be characterised to determine correctly the exponential decay of the intensity based on Lambert-Beer. We present a model for the confocal function in scattering media based on the illumination with a Gaussian beam and the power transfer into a single mode fibre (SMF) of the backscattered light for an incoherently back scattered Gaussian beam using the Huygens-Fresnel principle and compare that model with the reflection from a mirror. We find that, contrary to previous literature, the confocal functions characterised by the Rayleigh range in the two models are identical. Extensive OCT focus series measurements on a mirror, Spectralon and Intralipid dilutions confirm our model, and show that for highly scattering samples the confocal function characterised by the Rayleigh range becomes depth dependent. From the diluted Intralipid measurements the attenuation coefficients are extracted using a singly scatter model that includes the previously established confocal function. The extracted attenuation coefficients were in good agreement for weakly scattering samples (

Identifiers

PMID38855667
PMCPMC11161342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.