ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
Interfascial planes as surgical landmarks for laparoscopic upper retroperitoneal surgery: a cadaveric and retrospectively clinical study.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomy of Adipose Compartments and Fascial Structures in the Posterolateral Region of the Kidney With Special Focus on the Thin Adipose Compartment.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiologists currently accept the concept of "interfascial plane (IFP)" to understand retroperitoneal anatomy, replacing Meyers' classic tricompartmental theory. Despite much research on retroperitoneal anatomy, its anatomical structure, embryonic origin and developmental process still require further exploration to guide the optimization of surgical process. This study aims to explore the anatomical basis of IFP related to laparoscopic upper retroperitoneal surgery (LURS) and to compare the clinical outcomes of trans-interfascial plane procedures for LURS (TIFP-LURS) with conventional LURS (Con-LURS). Methods: The study consisted of two parts: cadaveric and clinical study. The cadaveric study involved dissecting and observing the retroperitoneal fasciae and IFP in 32 cadavers using gross anatomical and histological methods. This retrospective clinical study compared the perioperative data and complications of 229 patients who underwent TIFP-LURS and 121 patients who underwent Con-LURS for upper retroperitoneal lesions at our center. Results: The cadaveric study revealed that the retroperitoneal space was composed of multilaminar fasciae that formed potential bloodless spaces among them, that could be used as surgical landmarks and operating planes. The clinical study showed that TIFP-LURS had a significantly less estimated blood loss, lower intraoperative complication rate, lower postoperative complication rate, shorter hospital-stay and lower long-term postoperative complications rate than Con-LURS. Multivariate analysis indicated that the TIFP procedure was an independent protective factor for decreasing the risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: The IFP are potential avascular spaces that can be used during laparoscopic surgery, and TIFP-LURS is a novel surgical approach that can improve the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for upper retroperitoneal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.