ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
The ideal gluteal contouring in Thai-transwomen: cross-sectional descriptive study.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gluteal contouring is one of the major concerns of transwomen worldwide. Hip and gluteal surgery, as one type of gender-affirmation surgery (GAS), is now increasing in popularity to alleviate gender incongruence. This study investigated the ideal buttock shape in the Thai-transwomen population, which can further aid in the guidance for hip and gluteal surgery. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was done on transwomen attending services at Tangerine Community Health Center, the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic in Chulalongkorn Hospital, and Gender Health Community from 2022 to 2023. Participants were inquired about their ideal gluteal contouring using survey images of gluteal contouring of varying proportions and gluteal shapes on posterior and lateral views. Results: Among 373 participants, the most preferred waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in the posterior view and lateral view were 0.65 and 0.70, respectively. Regarding gluteal convexity, many participants preferred round shape buttocks the most (47.45%), followed by the A-shape (43.97%), square shape (7.77%) and, V-shape (0.80%). In the gluteal projection aspect, the most attractive type was the middle buttock type which data were congruence among each subgroup population. Conclusions: The image of a narrowing waist proportionated with a widening hip on the posterior view, with the WHR of 0.65, could be considered an ideal perception of beauty in transwomen. It could help the patient in decision-making and guiding the surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.